On Building Up… And Breaking Down…

Posted in Grumblings on November 21, 2015 by chemiclord

Let me tell you a story about a girl named Ronda Rousey.

(Yes, I’m talking about a sporty-ball thing.  Relax.  It has a greater purpose.)

For the better part of the last two years, we couldn’t stop hearing about this woman.  Whether it was glowing articles about how she was “most dominant athlete in the history of ever” (opinion: she wasn’t even the most dominant female athlete this year, go look up Serena Williams at some point), or her cross-promotions into WWE, and apparently upcoming television and film.

Everyone wanted to interview her, and damn near everyone did.

But in that same stretch, our culture was preparing for the inevitable.  We were ready for it.  We wanted it.  And then we finally got it.

Ronda Rousey lost.

The turn was immediate.  I got whiplash following the twist narrative from “most dominant” to “glory girl” and “poser” and “clearly flawed.”  As annoying as the former was… the heel turn our culture made was just about as tedious.

Because, well, this is what our culture does.  We build up our heroes, seemingly for the sole purpose of tearing them down.  We want our icons to be successful, but not too successful.  We take as much glee from the schadenfreude as we do from the triumph.  We enjoy the fall as much (if not more) than the ascension.

In every field of entertainment, this is what we do.  We wait in eager anticipation for our “favorite” writer’s next book to bomb (especially if said book isn’t from the series we want that author to write in), or the director’s next film to crash and burn, or for the “dynasty” sports team to crumble.

It’s a phenomenon that’s annoyed me for a while, but now as a culture we’ve completely abandoned the pretense as well.  We don’t even pretend anymore.  This is what we want… to raise people on our shoulders simply for the purpose of eventually dropping them on their head, then laughing in delight when we drop them.

That’s not culture.  That’s a cruel prank.  It’s something that you do as 12-year-olds.

Which may just be our level of cultural maturity, I guess.

Price Check on the Fire Fox…

Posted in Grumblings on September 27, 2015 by chemiclord

Now is as good of a time as any to get the newest addition to the Endgames series, with Amazon running a special price of $8.99 for the paperback!  http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Fox-MegaTokyo-Endgames-3/dp/0989931366/

Edit for Barnes and Noble link…

Posted in Grumblings on September 20, 2015 by chemiclord

Sorry about that folks, the main Fire Fox post should now CORRECTLY link to the Nook Store page.

What I Learned While Being Weird on the Internet…

Posted in Grumblings with tags , on September 19, 2015 by chemiclord

My path towards the fandom of Felicia Day might be a wee bit different than most.  I knew of her more than anything, never was a fan of Buffy… suffered through one or two episodes of Supernatural before I turned away… never watched the Guild… but I was vaguely aware of this cute redheaded girl that set so many nerd boys’ hearts aflutter.

(For the record, redheads aren’t normally “my thing” ((cue astonished boos and hissing)), which no doubt helped me kinda shrug and look away.)

No, my first real experience with Ms. Day’s headspace came through a Facebook “controversy.”  She had… cut her hair!  Crime and villainy!  Treason!  Betrayal!  She looks old!!!

Because I take no end of delight in the suffering of boys on the Internet, I got curious and started digging through the web, eventually coming upon Felicia’s tumblr space where she explained why she did it.

(For the record, the idea that she was harassed to the point where she had to justify something she did to herself still makes me go cross-eyed.)

Well, it turned out… goodness… this was one smart, sassy, clever young lady.  From there, I liked her on Facebook, followed her on Twitter, wound up sharing short exchanges on her Twitch channel…

Yep.  I like damn near every other guy on the planet had fallen under her spell.  I was a fan.

So when she started promoting her memoir, I was able to suppress my normal disdain for such autobiographical material, and almost immediately bought it.

(You can buy it yourself here, for the record, though I doubt she needs the plug from me.)

Ms. Day had frequently hinted at her weird life, and to read about it was a very enlightening bit of reading, especially with how much of it resonated with me.  I felt pangs of knowing sympathy as she talked about struggling with her drafts (I scrapped and rewrote my first novel for ten years, Felicia… I know your pain).  I nodded in empathy as she wrote about the inner demons that repeatedly tried to convince her that she wasn’t any good.  I cringed when I understood how she kinda fell apart around those she admired (again, I am really sorry I got drunk and offered to comb your beard, Mookie).

I dropped my head in understanding when she revealed how little creative work from others she experienced.  Between my day job and my writing, I have precious little time for anything else.  I still have to read GRRM’s fifth book, for example.  I giggled in delight to learn she had been big on the fanfiction scene (as much as I shudder at the idea of game writing, if Casey Hudson asked me to work with Mass Effect, the only question would be which foot of mine I tripped on running at the opportunity).

I even metaphorically patted her on the shoulder as she recalled her brush-up with #GamerGate.  I had only marginally come across the edges of that “movement” and could not imagine being in their crosshairs.  I know all too well the mortifying moment when you step out in front of people and realize they were there for you.  And I especially know the strain that being creative has on your mind and body as you struggle to keep up with everything.

Too long, didn’t read version; You’re Never Weird on the Internet is a wonderful book, and is a remarkably candid window into the world of creative people and what they slog through just to bring what is in their head to life.  I would recommend it to anyone, especially those struggling with their own creative path.

The Fire Fox has Arrived! (Sorta)

Posted in Grumblings, Updates on September 16, 2015 by chemiclord

Okay, ladies and gentlemen… bear with me here while I try and get you folks all up to date.

Amazon is doing weird things, some of which may be of benefit to all of you.

First of all, if you guys want the Kindle version of “Fire Fox”, it is actually available for pre-order for the 25th of September. Follow this link if you wish to do so: http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Fox-MegaTokyo-Endgames-Book-e…/…/

For Nook, they are dead set on a release on the 25th, no preorders or other bells and whistles. I’ll give you folks that link once it goes live.

Now, here’s where it gets weird. If you want the paperback version of Fire Fox… well… it’s available right now. Yep. Amazon’s jumping the gun by about 8 days. http://www.amazon.com/Fire-Fox-MegaTokyo-Endg…/…/0989931366/

I don’t know how this will affect Kindle matchbook or any other cross promotional deals, and I’ll update the main page once all three formats are officially released.  But if you really want the dead tree of the third book in the Endgames series, you folks are in luck. It’s here.

The Fire Fox is Coming…

Posted in Updates with tags , , on August 30, 2015 by chemiclord

Quick update for everyone, but Book Three of the MegaTokyo: Endgames series, “Fire Fox” now has an official release date of September 25, 2015.  As with the previous two, the cover price will be $9.99, so start savin’ up now!

On the Fermi Paradox…

Posted in Grumblings with tags , , on August 28, 2015 by chemiclord

Yes, I know… it’s a burst of content for this blog!  No, I don’t know who I am and what I did with the real creator of this blog, so please stop asking.

This topic is returning back to more the intended roots of this blog, though.  My first real exposure to the Fermi Paradox was when I was a pre-teen living outside Engadine, Michigan.  Where is Engadine, Michigan you may ask?  Imagine one of the most rural and isolated parts of the lower United States, a town so small its population sign needed three digits and didn’t even warrant a stoplight.  You had to drive two hours for the nearest shopping center.

I didn’t even live in that town.  I lived a half hour outside that town.  If the Upper Peninsula of Michigan was the armpit of the country, I was living at the end of one of the pit hairs.

Point is… I lived in a pretty isolated place where my nearest neighbor was roughly a mile and a half away.

Anyway, it was a summer night and I was looking up at the stars (one advantage of living way out on the pit hairs of civilization is that the view of the sky is amazing), and my father was the first one to pose to me what I would later learn was called the Fermi Paradox.  If this universe is so full of life… why don’t we see any evidence of it?

Even then, I thought the question was rather absurd.  It would have been like me walking out to the end of the driveway, not see any other human beings, and wonder if I’m the only person in the whole world.  Even if through nothing but simple math and probability, I’d know that wasn’t true in the slightest.

That’s kinda how I view the Fermi Paradox, really… a question that sounds deep and philosophical but is really kinda dumb when you actually think about it.  Let’s be honest when we look out into the sky… we haven’t been looking very hard.  Hell, we can’t look very hard.  Right now, the only way we can find other planets is by inference.  Our farthest out man made object has barely broken out of the heliopause.  The most recent communication we could be possibly be receiving from another inhabited world is roughly 12 years old… assuming there even is a habitable world in Tau Ceti.

Let’s flip the script, and look at it from the perspective of another civilization out there in the universe.  Even if they figured there was intelligent life specifically around our Sun… how much of our civilization would be visible without being right in orbit around Earth?

We’re at the end of the driveway outside of Engadine… wondering where all the people are.

There’s no reason to think we’re alone in this vast universe.  It’s only a matter of time before we find it.  How long will that be is the only question worth musing about.

On Sensible Gun Control in America…

Posted in Grumblings on August 28, 2015 by chemiclord

I didn’t get terribly into details on Gun Control itself in an earlier post, because I wanted to focus on the larger picture beyond that one issue.  But it is true that gun control in America is an issue to be addressed, so here are my somewhat disjointed thoughts on that specific topic.

  • Thoughts like this don’t help the discussion, and honestly miss the mark.  While yes… there certainly are regular people who absolutely abhor anything but completely unfettered access to firearms, they are an insignificant minority of human beings (and I use that term loosely to describe those maniacs).  Go to any corner of this nation, and I think you will discover that Americans in fact don’t think the killing of children is bearable.  Next to no one objects to authorities at the very least better enforcing the laws we currently have, and would at least tolerate any new laws or actions that fall short of the ATF busting down their doors and taking the guns they own.
  • So what is the proper target for our anger?  The gun manufacturers who look at the deaths and the casualties and decide their profit margins that come from anyone and their mother being able to buy a gun are more important.  The National Rifle Association should really be called the National Firearm Manufacturers Association at this point, and it’s that political lobby that has perpetually stalled and misrepresented every attempt to stiffen the laws that allow access to firearms.
  • do believe we need to extend the liability laws when it pertains to gun usage.  If your weapon has been used in a crime, you should be able to held liable for the damage done with it.  Starting with civil litigation (paying out in the case of a wrongful death suit, for example) with repeat offenses leading to criminal charges (if your weapons keep winding up in the hands of criminals… at some point, you become the criminal).
  • In the case of black market weapons that had no previous established owner, the gun manufacturer can and should be held liable for the damage done.  That hopefully would end the little Manufacture – Mexico – hop the border to the U.S. black market triangle that seems to conveniently happen to the benefit of gun manufacturers.
  • Which leads to every weapon in the U.S. being required to be registered to whoever legally owns said weapon.  Some states already do this… but it should be a national requirement.  Carrying an unlicensed firearm should start small (a minor fine), to a misdemeanor offense for repeated violations.  Careful monitoring of who owns what weapon and when it changes hands is a good thing, it’s not a sign that the “gubbermint” is going to steal your guns.

Gun Control doesn’t equal a gun-free nation.  First of all, that would never happen.  But clearly there needs to be some degree of responsibility imposed on gun manufacturers and the public that buys them, because we quite clearly and evidently can’t police ourselves on this score.

On Violence and Gun Control

Posted in Grumblings with tags , , , on August 27, 2015 by chemiclord

Well, here we are again, my friends.  Looking at the aftermath of another day riddled with horrific gun violence in a very public fashion.  And once again, it’s time to rev the engines on the hottest debate to flood through the laymen and women of this country… gun control.

Now, I don’t want to dismiss the issue of gun control.  I do believe it’s important.  I do believe that easy access to guns with very few restrictions and little effort to enforce those few restrictions is a very big problem.  But at the same time, it’s not the only problem, and just improved gun control isn’t going to solve the tragedies that seem to occur on nearly a weekly basis nowadays.

These sort of events, this sort of complete collapse of humanity and general empathy to another person or group of people isn’t like a visit to Dairy Queen, where you pick one thing and consider your dessert run complete.  It’s more like an all you can eat buffet, where you get a whole meal taking from a bunch of different items.

Just removing easy access to guns isn’t going to solve the distressing lack of support for mental health and initiatives that aid people with mental illness.  It’s not going to quell the increasing disquiet about simmering racial tensions and culture of fear that lead to police officers shooting unarmed black men.  It’s not going to solve the increasing plight of people feeling they don’t have any other options to affect change in our social and economic structures.

It’s all well and good to fight for stronger gun control.  But humans (especially us Americans, it would seem) have this very obnoxious tendency to win one battle, then happily walk away like we had won the entire war.  We cannot allow this one flashpoint be the only one we address in our deeply scarred culture.

On Gawker and Journalistic Responsibility…

Posted in Grumblings with tags , , , , on July 18, 2015 by chemiclord

I’m not keen on going into details, mostly because anyone who doesn’t know shouldn’t be informed on the specifics (and I’ll get to why later) and anyone else doesn’t need a recap.

But the general thrust is that Gawker media ran an article that they shouldn’t have, and was forced to retract it after severe blowback by the community at large, despite the union’s protest that such unilateral action should not be accepted.  There is a process, they say, and they can’t let the business side of things subvert that process, even if the article isn’t deemed appropriate.

On one hand, I understand that.  Once you say, “Well… okay…” and give in without a fight, that sets a precedent.  Now your business-side can yank anything they feel hurts the bottom line and say, “Well, you let us do it with this article…” and once you let executives do that, it really kills the journalistic integrity that is vital for a publication to be given any weight in the public eye.

But there is another side that Internet reporting is finally starting to discover now that they’ve won the war with the old guard of media; journalistic responsibility.

Journalism has a responsibility not only to report the truth, but also to report the relevant.  There was absolutely nothing relevant about the article that was removed.  It didn’t expose any blatant hypocrisy.  It didn’t show a dark side that no one realized existed.  It was a hit piece, designed to do damage to a rival website, and nothing more.

Make no mistake, the old guard failed their responsibility quite often, and so this is hardly a new conundrum.  Back when the war for journalism was still being fought, the Internet reporting community felt only one question truly mattered; “Is it true?”  And when you’re fighting a pretty obviously compromised and corrupted fourth estate, that’s really the only question that needed to matter.

But now, as the bulk of Americans (and possibly the world) are now turning to Internet reporting like Gawker as their primary source of information… “is it true” isn’t enough on its own.  Hopefully, this is a lesson Gawker has learned, and other information centers on the Internet will learn through this example.